A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
我真是没啥东西可看 点开看了一会儿 剧情居然还可以 但是最后还得往人心比鬼可怕这个主题上靠感觉就卸力了
剧情ok，首位连接，没有bug。故事有点多，中途疲劳。最后结局画蛇添足，停在老爷子那里就可以了。不完全算民俗题材，但立意很好，值得一看。
无知的善意和恶意并无两样，他才是拯救她的那个人啊。
妈的我是被抖音上的剪辑骗了啊啊啊！！最气人的是在电视上看的版本最吓人的画面还被剪掉了！！
人们只能看到想看到的东西。善意被曲解成恶意，理解会变成误解。雨点落在书上，你看见了我，我看见了你。
本着消遣看看，还有点小惊喜。有人才有妖啊！
网大才是国产恐怖片发展的正道，毕竟尺度要大一些。
据说口碑不错就来看看，毕竟网大电影，不该要求过高，但不得不说这种电影真没意思。把一些耳熟能详的故事整合，编成看似故事完整又有教育意义的电影，只适合小孩子看。探索恐怖电影在我国的可能性是值得表扬的，但这部显然已经偏离了恐怖的范围，可能委曲求全，或剧本本来就没单薄，发展和结局都甚是平庸无聊。
……一开始没感觉什么，还流了泪，但是但是但是到最后那里，多少擦嘴那里，真的多少达咩，正常人的情感不允许我……
这编剧是我当阴阳先生那几年的作者崔走召啊，看了好多人也不知道了。
故事编的还算可以，就是手法，演员是个很大短板
一个字：绝。（即便所有人都知道的罗生门叙事还是相当有味道）
有如《三言两拍》的话本故事，用的是东北世俗怪谈的底子。表面上讲狐妖鬼怪，里子却道尽人性的幽暗复杂。借用黑泽天皇的《罗生门》架构，几个版本的故事真假难辨，以小见大，环环相扣。网大故事有此格局，实属难得。
看完“警长说电影”剧透来的，下面附上链接：https://b23.tv/x8aghUc。
本以为是部烂片 结果还真挺可以 有点罗生门内味儿
网大才是国产恐怖片发展的正道，毕竟尺度要大一些。
可惜原作了 换成是枝裕和拍好点 希望能出剧版
善恶无形，虚化为狐妻，实为人心；施善过度，也变成了恶。
我很喜欢很美很安静的电影，灵魂的伴侣不需要任何理由，让我看到爱的美好就够了！
人性就是这么自私贪婪，又不懂感恩
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
