A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
剧本真的好扎实 演员的劲儿也很好 中间穿插的包袱也很喜欢 看完了内心有点澎湃 万万没想到都多久了啊
想起了婚礼上的司仪，该到哭的时候，你就必须哭，不哭的话，就说一些更煽情的话术
尹正现在端着的感觉真让人不舒服，和王传君一样。
这是一部成功的黑色喜剧，欢笑表层下露出严肃的人性反思。在这个提倡情商的年代，呼唤道德的声音愈发少了。影片的当代意识便显得敏锐。
但是模仿的痕迹太重了，从表演到配乐都是这种感觉（或者说是玩梗、致敬？）
一部借古喻今的电影，告诉你家里没有两把刷子，别混娱乐圈。在独立的他为她背负人命并牺牲自己的那个故事里，如果你问她，她是怎么活过来的，她会告诉你她不委屈，因为曾有个人为了给她出头不惜牺牲自己，她会好好活下去。
剧情反转也很自然，片中登场的八个人物演技也很好，不得不说，整体演员的演技完全在线，都不是大流量演员，但是演技都很惊艳！
1、给片名字打90分！2、2021票房预测滑铁卢++1。
四星半，确实是2021年最给我惊喜的电影了，现在觉的21年国产电影最佳是这一部，也是很后悔没去影院了。影片开场强烈的话剧感让我觉得新鲜好玩，前面的梗我就已经笑出声好几次了，没想到的是后面给我看哭了...刚开始的反转好猜，但没想到后面还没结束。几个人物出场可有意思了，各有各的算计和“猥琐”，越到后面竟都越顺眼了起来。里面有好多比较明显的讽刺，准备看看别人的解析自己有没有漏掉什么
一部有“韩寒”气质的影片，一部有“无双”情节的脉络，有佳句有欢乐，说着类鸡汤反讽的底色或多或少消解了逻辑漏洞。
做得最好地方是温情和悬疑，倒不如完全放弃万合天宜搞笑那部分，整体还会有提升。不喜欢像《驴得水》一样完全放在极致情境里体现人性的电影，但设置在民国才能讲，就是时代的妥协，和去越南拍一样。观感可以给三星半。
属于那种电影院看会给四星，在家看会给三星的片子。其实工业水平也不高，不过故事讲得还算圆。
这部电影挺有趣的，本煜大魔王已经进化为万合天宜演技最好的人了吧，我觉得他已经突破了万合天宜的圈 ，就算出演其他的都依旧能演的很好。到现在我都还记得我刘循子墨的孙悟空哈哈哈哈，时代的眼泪啊
这才是2021年最牛逼的国产电影好吧
这种悬疑、讽刺、黑色幽默的有效组合在近几年非常少见了，哪怕是相声、小品那些讽刺艺术的最佳载体也早已被磨平了棱角，只剩下了浅薄的煽情与鸡血的歌功颂德。夹缝求生，当真不易。
“我叫你爸，你打我马，这样对吗”，笑疯，童年回忆集结号，主创玩得很好，再接再厉。
首先是惊喜，然后是感动。惊喜的是能在院线看到这么一部剧作精巧、番底连翻的国产电影，足够的呼应、互文的元素，却又能基本不脱离三一律、舞台效果拉满，一定程度上放弃群像的人物深度刻画来实现的精彩故事，这是我最梦想能写出的剧本。 然后是有感叹于十几年前万合天宜这帮有才的年轻人，在拍了那么多只为了赚钱的网剧、烂片之后，还能有这样的才情、拍出这样的电影。这不是《如月疑云》，也不是《利刃出鞘》，更不是什么剧本杀电影，但这就是在这个优秀国产电影荒年里的久旱甘霖。
一出电影版的剧本杀，把剧本杀的原则表达地很清楚:1 本子最重要 2 DM是灵魂 3 绝不能跳车 4 实景换装比圆桌好玩 5 一定要点好吃的外卖 6 不要把私人感情带到桌上 7 打完最好复个盘。
故事讲述“三老”贪污军火费，导致战役失败，幸存下来的士兵和死去连长的女儿一起复仇杀“三老”的故事！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
