Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
感谢编剧没有让李焕英以少胜多赢下排球赛。这个剧其实好就好在它的质朴情感上。没有什么输赢胜负，也没有什么人生逆袭改变命运。穿越回来只为了让你开心。不完美的小人物在闪闪发光。
2021年，李焕英让我觉得妈妈始终没有远离我
"献给所有伟大的母亲"，主题一下子升华，电影结束后观众的赞美声再次证明了煽情永远是电影最低级最取巧的表现手法。片中的母爱远没有达到伟大的地步
《李焕英》并不是一部简单粗暴的纯喜剧，而是一部悲喜剧。贾玲在悲与喜之间找到了非常好的平衡，用密集的笑点和反套路的情节带动整个片子的节奏和气氛，又在结尾给观众狠狠一刀，主题自然的便流露出来。
电影有时候很神奇，真诚比技巧重要。观众往往能因为真诚而选择性忽略导演匮乏的技巧，剧作上的漏洞，甚至人物上的仓促和单薄。
故事说不上新颖，可是母亲这个点总是能打动人，希望每个做母亲的女生记得对自己好点，不要牺牲不要伟大，让自己开心快乐很重要。
绝对五星，名副其实的华语年度最佳！荒诞的艺术，光怪陆离的社会变迁，《霸王别姬》的隔空对唱，模糊舞台和荧幕的扑面而来的丁达尔效应，极具个人色彩和地方特色的空灵的戏梦版的表达
贾玲这个片子在春节档其实还蛮能引起中老年观众的共鸣的（我妈就抢着要看这个片子）食堂、电视机、工厂这些元素都是他们记忆里元素，也能理解贾玲对于她母亲的情感，但是这个片子实在是有点无趣。
平心而论，这部片子有的地方像小品，有的地方衔接有问题，有的地方处理得太简单，但是，这些都掩盖不住这部电影的真诚与真心，真是熠熠生辉，灼人眼睛，让人反复落泪。尤其是电影后半部分的那一处反转，反转得非常高级，熨平了前面不顺畅的一切。
我要强烈批评影片最后刻画母亲买票又退票在大雪天中一个人走回去的镜头，我不接受，母爱不是因为牺牲才伟大，爱与关怀本身就是伟大。
生女儿的妈看不了的电影
题材很容易共鸣，不代表就拍的很好，就很中规中矩，甚至不如唐人街
电影的前90%我都以为是女儿穿越回去改变妈妈命运的故事，结果最后10%突然发现可能这只是一个母亲弥留之际创造出来安慰女儿的梦
大型欢乐喜剧人小品一则，胜在感情真挚。张小斐可以的。我和我妈全程无表情看完，无情母女。
上次见到邱导是两年前的事了，印象最深刻的是他是一个对自己塑造的角色有着敬畏感的人。
另：来台湾三年才终于看了电影节，也是第一次经历电影放完亮灯全员鼓掌，感觉很有趣。
贾玲现在不仅健康快乐，还出息了，焕英阿姨你看到了吗
在影片的结尾部分，留给观众的，唯一担之不去的问题是五福是否会喝下孟婆汤，这将抹去他前世的记忆，为转世投胎做准备。
贾晓玲撮合李焕英和沈光林这段有很多笑点，但内核是很扎心的。
我以为只有我回到了1981,我以为我可以牺牲我自己改变你往后的命运，我以为你可以更幸福的，我没想到你愿意过的就是摊上我的这一生😭
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
