Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
主旋律的电影，似乎一定要人命牺牲才显出高大伟大。但若朗措大哥好好活着，好好陪着学生，不好吗？还有僧格，也算是强行牺牲了。
我沉迷于男女主感情线无法自拔
蛮多设定挺像教室里的一头牦牛。抛却些许理想的外衣，总有人因缘际会选择驻留。与自然条件共生，与野生动物共存，与盗猎者抗争。
女主也太伟大了，自己哥哥去世还要忍痛给孩子们做饭，连悲伤的时间都没有，真的很心疼
感觉可以多拍一些这样的电影，很有教育意义，也让我们看到了藏区的真实生活
另外2颗星给那些藏族演员。
很感人。一定要有一个既有学识又有爱心的人留下来，才能让更多藏区孩子走出去。
好喜欢韩松和梅朵这对，郎才女貌特别般配，要是感情戏在多一点就更好了
看得出经费一般了，不过幸好有天然的藏区风景，算是弥补了一下
没想到看到最后潸然泪下而不自觉。韩松最初支教是因为青春的躁动，最后一步一步改变着西藏的教育，为这些孩子的未来铺垫
每个风景特写都可以直接截图做桌面了，太美了，总有一天我要亲眼去看看
很多生活上的镜头挺温馨的，特别是聚在一起吃的时候，我特别喜欢这类情节。
很正的一部电影，男女主都是那种自然美，没有外在因素添加，我挺喜欢的
我不曾到达的地方,我的学生若是去了,那便是我也去过了。看着这些孩子，我忽然就明白了当老师的意义。
虽然说是事实，但是我扣了点分是因为结局的原因，！谁不希望有个好结局呢
如果结局在好一些，可能就不会有这么多眼泪，但是这样的结局。也是才是最真实的
看完整个影片可以说是意犹未尽，回味无穷。这部电影没有很华丽的手法，没有很绚烂的景致，没有很精美的服装道具，但是所表达的情感却直击人心。只有最真挚的情感才能够打动人，在这部电影里朗措的英勇，梅朵的善良，韩老师的坚持，孩子们对于知识的渴望以及草原的宽容、孤寂、辽阔，还有背后的阴影，所有的这一切组成了这部电影的最美与最痛。 最为荒凉，最为落后的地方，总是会因为一些人一些事而变得美好正是因为有了他们，国家才会源源不断的进步，教育才会不断的发展。希望越来越多的孩子能够走出大山，看看这个世界，也希望驻扎在山区的老师无病无痛无灾无难，希望山区的人民都能越过越好。
磕cp有点上头哇，话说女主看起来挺眼熟，要是他俩现实也在一起就好了，就是有的地方剧情过渡的不是很完美
开头的时候，朗措大哥去接韩松这位支教老师到学校，一路上内心没有想到条件如此辛苦，但是等见到孩子们的那一刻，他们对知识的渴望，看着看着眼泪就掉下来了。
服装疯狂看着挺舒服，剧情不评价，在同类型里也算比较平常
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
