Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
轻巧，但总觉得像是在指尖上跳舞，女主角越看越没有感觉，似乎全程都在傻笑，但是戏写的还是很好的，唯一不理解的是最后见面的设计，私恋失调里跑步用长焦，配上走廊像在走迷宫，为什么这里两个人都要见面了，还用长焦让他们的奔跑看起来像是原地奔跑？
#第一部PTA# 复古基调，琐碎叙事，别样青春，纯真爱情。我还蛮喜欢的。
7月31日周日晚上，横店影城5号厅，就我一个人，打瞌睡了。
首先要讲好故事。（今年奥斯卡提名怎么都又臭又长啊
我是brony所以打五星。片子告诉我们一个简单的道理，要怀疑历史书
can't say i totally get it，但从中看出了青春，看出了迷惘，看出了疯狂。
'Soggy Bottom' sounds like someone shit their pants.
是没看过这个类型的爱情片，可也不咋感人啊，无法共情
疯狂愚蠢的爱，PTA是恶补了多少日剧才拍出这么多奔跑桥段。
剧情中规中矩，从M6暂时变成了M5，也算是对应G5，不过还有一位会不会是电影里被忽略的海马，也比较希望是独角兽，只有一只不够对称，最后天角兽加上两只天马就多了。
随着抽烟手势摇镜头
竟然挺喜欢的，就像是全世界都知道你爱他，你却不知道
挺有意思的儿童游戏，儿童成人化，第一场戏就能看见大结局，没想到要经历这么多的波折啊。
由此，怀旧从水床弹珠机等构成的表象出发，途径酒吧与餐厅粘稠老派的氛围，走向了滞留于记忆更深处的，对于年代与世界的触感。
不俗的视听语言所以是看着很享受很有意思的片子，说有意思其实又没什么意思的故事… （waterbed开幕那晚拍Alana看Gary, 出门安排两个外形相近的人在旁边，被骗到一次… 看窗户缝不给反打；councilman在饭店那个借一点镜像的绕圈long take；日剧跑很讲究screen direction，从追逐运动变成相遇运动了⋯是会二刷看电影语言的片子但故事编织不能算精细
3.5 主体思想：男的都是烂人。 镜头控制力没话说，希望下部电影找个好故事吧。
感情跳跃，叙事凌乱，全靠观众脑补，妄称大作。神棍之辈必有神棍之徒追捧。
热狗店黄昏温暖的痴笑。远处看着哥哥窘迫拿着话筒。光晕切割的时候提出了割礼的问题。鼓点像是进入丛林，青少年集会如同丛林。男女主无声拥抱镜像。男主像是穿过战场烟雾向女主奔去，老兵喋喋不休韩战。弹球房与竞选男女主价值观冲突。你知道她在哪里工作然后对视无言。对70年代的祛魅，有意避免了深刻。
我是brony所以打五星。片子告诉我们一个简单的道理，要怀疑历史书
3.5 绝对不差，但也没太多惊喜。即便在这样一个私人的爱情故事里，也有好多精彩的，关于媒介的思考和自反。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
