Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
拍的很稳，这是平遥影展这几天看的情感最真的一部电影。某处段落也被感动，作为新导演第一部已经很不错。结尾一镜可以去掉似乎更有力量，当然只是个人想法。
why 小畑？why泽野？why parkour？why 荒木？why虚渊？why 海的女儿？why you do this to me？
3.5，拼贴感太重，戏和表演尬的时刻很多，剧作缺乏主题。寿衣店老板的山西话加分，爸爸蹲马桶喊着要回小东门、秦父子俩厨房对谈、秦父在殡仪馆劝姐妹节哀三段表演准确而动人。女儿推着父亲从公园走进烟雾、单镜头蒙太奇从窗外现在时跳回窗内高中再跳回现实贼灵，结尾废墟中的鬼魅镜头令人印象深刻。
画风挺美，其他都啥玩意儿，简直浪费了这么好的制作，男主情感转变很突兀，没什么铺垫，忽然就蹦出一句遇到女主自己才变得完整，看得我满脸问号
2022 113
开头不介绍一下世界观，一言不合就跑酷，看的有些莫名其妙
爱情故事一般，普通吧。主要是人类末日的氛围提升了点主题
用心做画面，用脚写剧本。不少人说《泡泡》和《天气之子》、《海兽之子》很像，我非常同意，这三部难看得一模一样。
只能说拍得比较真实，但水平还有很大的进步空间。
3.5，拼贴感太重，戏和表演尬的时刻很多，剧作缺乏主题。寿衣店老板的山西话加分，爸爸蹲马桶喊着要回小东门、秦父子俩厨房对谈、秦父在殡仪馆劝姐妹节哀三段表演准确而动人。女儿推着父亲从公园走进烟雾、单镜头蒙太奇从窗外现在时跳回窗内高中再跳回现实贼灵，结尾废墟中的鬼魅镜头令人印象深刻。
老虚这是写了个啥剧本😅剧情些许莫名其妙，说是现代版人鱼公主和王子吧，也不太是😅我甚至怀疑泡泡是为了增加画面的美感😅好说不说，作画确实很美，动作很流畅，跑酷的一些镜头想到立体机动装置。如果mamo配的是男主就好了，因为不是，所以扣一星。
整个就是扩写版的人鱼公主，相对比较低龄，用“物质会聚成螺旋，所以我们还会再相遇”这种说法就想强行happy end还是太单纯了点
这部电影的虚构幻想部分和结尾高潮剧情都值得我们思考 真的被低估了
《你的名字》片长只有106分钟，但自2016年上映至今从未停播。
灾难奇幻的设定好棒，废都野生的世界观也太向往了。诗和响的禁忌之恋。剧本方面跟不上啊，夹带太多私货了，像是跑酷宣传片。音乐必须要给个奖啊。总体下来有点像《你的名字》，但是有点用力过猛。
长镜头不应该成为导演的遮羞布。看到平遥把奖项从山西出发给到这部，有些绝望，山西本地能否有新的、年轻的、大胆的、新的视角的电影出来被看到，我看不到希望。
3.5平遥这届观众这么严格这么挑剔吗？有很多瑕疵，也有很多不足，但能看出来导演的真诚，也能看出来导演想突破这类题材限制
重温了一遍海的女儿。
多个长镜头太出彩了。厕所内外墙的分隔，观众也直到后处才能看到下半身。医院别人的抢救失败是女主内心的外化又是强烈对比。轮椅起雾起舞很美，魂归故里时特别《伊比利亚的派对》。问题出在故事的衔接有瑕疵。
疾病或许是比死亡更难迈过的坎。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
