A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
不禁张大嘴巴，啧啧称奇。有些画面极易引起不适。部分影评谈此片基于旧约圣经，如此云云。
压根没看懂。疯神就是人自己吧。感觉导演反宗教且厌恶人类。那些个畸形血肉模糊真是怪恶心怪脏的
筹备了三十多年做出的定格动画，虽然不解其深意，但我大为震撼，频频作呕。
…恶熏 反胃…我实在是欣赏不了这种暗黑的动画…
又“看不懂但大受震撼.jpg”了，不过很享受观看过程。
除了画面比较有冲击，想象力隐喻和讽刺的情节🐮
没看懂，但还挺好看的～怪异黑暗血腥中透着诡异的可爱。
如果是游戏cg，这款游戏我肯定会玩，但问题是电影，实在难以理解里面内容，跟装逼电影一线之差，可里面的怪物造型和定格形式去表现还是可以，看得出有想法...
从硬件说，这已经不是电影了，是被拍下来的行为艺术。从软件说，片子拥有不低的立意，大概讲了三件事，一是地狱发生自人的恨意，在地狱的系统里生命的一切活动将只化作对彼此施加的痛苦；二是地狱的发生是必然的结果；三是轮回不止。整体是了不起的东西，硬说缺点的话，一是血腥程度还是会产生观影障碍，二是结论太绝望，没有涉及出离的解脱。
这是部政治人性片，隐喻太深不敢明说，怕豆瓣再罚150万
就是。。。没啥说的。。。语言太匮乏了 只能说牛逼 除了牛逼真没啥说的。。。
两星敬佩制作过程，不过太冗长了，完全可以压缩一半的。
果不其然，这种装逼甚至非常神经质的片在豆瓣评分很高，正常人估计十分钟都坚持不了。豆瓣，呵呵
2.片尾的那个矮子怪人通过望远镜看到的是蘑菇云，也许这象征了最能够异化人类的也许就是人类自身的行为。
是那一类7分中规中矩历史片，题材、剧本、演员在那，执行地只要规规矩矩就不会差的那种，现在的历史片因为大事件都拍过了现在就专挑一些不为人知的隐藏故事从小抓起，这部还是容易看进去的，洗白张伯伦，乔治麦凯又开始奔跑了，帝国的毁灭演戈培尔的演员终于混到演元首了
Phil前后花了30年筹划制作，定格技术是真的棒，画面非常流畅，叙事略无趣(中间我甚至看睡着了两三次)，但不妨碍它优秀的视觉效果
看的第一部定格动漫，属实给震撼到了，诡异，邪典，血腥，恐怖，到处是怪异肮脏的生物，面目可憎，有我看克苏鲁神话那味了
欣赏不来这种电影，乱七八糟的，完全是浪费时间。
压根没看懂。疯神就是人自己吧。感觉导演反宗教且厌恶人类。那些个畸形血肉模糊真是怪恶心怪脏的
看起来很屌，但好孩子真的不要看
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
