This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
电影前半段就像一台工作机器，按照Checklist细致入微地拍出每一项待办事项。随即落入帕尔玛《凶线》的叙事框架，但依旧保持情节及技法的极简化。
艾伦索金强大的叙事能力和效率需要建立在故事本身就很精彩的基础上才能发挥出来，然而这部电影完全没有这个先天优势，看完以后只想问一句sowhat。哈维尔巴登成为了唯一的亮点。
艾伦索金强大的叙事能力和效率需要建立在故事本身就很精彩的基础上才能发挥出来，然而这部电影完全没有这个先天优势，看完以后只想问一句sowhat。哈维尔巴登成为了唯一的亮点。
社恐患者版“后窗”？这时长是不是标错了，找的资源都是89min
A / 用《放大》击碎《后窗》直达《审判》。声与画一开始便分离为两条线，前者为闭锁却仍然向过去深潜的人物内在，后者为跃过外部世界封锁的渴望——它们在一个身体跌坐的姿势中碰撞，在想象的召唤中让多重记忆叠合，从而促发人物的空间突围。但索德伯格显然并未天真到让人物畅行无阻，而是将她放入了更为散乱的迷宫中——把《删除历史》里金钟罩般的科技公司拆解成细碎的隔间、回廊、楼梯、数据库，把地面红蓝相间的广场拟态为破碎的星条旗，来往的行人彷如被放进matrix般亦真亦幻。好在声音最终勾连起了那些上手的武器，夹缝空间中物的网络亦是庇荫与反抗的根据——而她依然保有在一片狼藉中，打开那扇门的勇气。
i love the ending how important is the word home for lucy ps.男主和男配的提名真的水的可以
——你们注定会分开，没有人像你们相爱，但是他们平淡无趣反而得到了求不得的可以永远在一起的诅咒。
社恐患者如我应该会喜欢这部，掏出包包里东西发现大家都差不多的装备
很难找到让人看下去的理由，表演也并没有那么精彩
想要谈及海思法案，又拍的像是经海思法典的规整后的故事，艾伦·索金，天才的黯淡呀。
另外，闪回的插入把剪辑和节奏确实拖得不轻。
想说的东西太多，没有拎出清晰的脉络。反复的闪回再加上妆造区别不够大导致中间很容易迷失在时间线中。Kidman的表演中规中矩，让她演喋喋不休的角色没有大魔王来的自然
电影就像一道奥数题，看一遍就明白了，就失去兴趣，看三遍还不明白，一样会失去兴趣。这个就恰到好处，第二遍看完，通透，完美。
Sorkin版的好莱坞往事，金牌一出手，还是好看的，自己的脑内小剧场也拍出来了吧，就不断觉得写得真细啊，但和the newsroom一样是主业线强爱情线跟不上，最后的发呆戏表演上并不能信服
呃，能不能少拍一点这种裹脚布一样又臭又长的传记电影，除了助力演员冲奥看不出来有任何可鉴之处…
是我没get到的一部艾伦·索金作品了，化妆师怎么可以把妮可基德曼化得这么不像妮可基德曼。
个人偏爱这种错乱的叙事方式，让我在这个过程中和女主一起感受耀眼卑微幸福沮丧自疑自信。“我想有个家。”
一般般，心疼Lucy，但确实是个boss ass bitch
人物性格转变太突兀了 人设立不起来 女主这种病根本不是很快就能克服的 不适合电影里的设定（参考无耻之徒里的Sheila 那位转变的就很合理）
因为主演看的电影，故事情节和内容都没有共鸣
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
