Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
作为我疼的脑残粉，也至多三分不能再多了，三分全是给腾哥的辛苦分，连丽姐在这片里的人设都分不了这分一点。剧情不剧情喜剧不喜剧，烂梗乱飞尬点靠演员撑戏，要笑不笑要哭不哭的真的给人吊的很难受。
特效还不错，有些梗在里头，但搞不懂为何喜剧到最后总是要强行煽情。
作为二十多年的科幻迷，基本麻花的话剧电影看个差不多的非麻花迷，在周六加班完非常丧的情况下，看完觉得非常满足。
前半段本来挺好的，笑点也都还不错，结果后半段彻底跑偏，并且在我最讨厌的无脑好莱坞式英雄主义情结上无法自拔。基于对开心麻花的期待，我一直希望最后哪怕来一个喜剧的无厘头的收尾也行，结果竟然就是最老套的英雄主义，最讨厌的结尾没有之一。受不了后面的强行煽情和各种bug和个人英雄主义崇拜情节，没办法因为前面的喜剧就打高分，剧本确实跑偏太多了。
如果它不是一部喜剧，可能评价会更好一点，因为前三分之一的搞笑部分真的不怎么高明，反而是感情戏完成的比喜剧好简直太多，救刚子那段看的我眼泪哗哗的，没办法我就吃这一套。当然整个故事还是建立在一个很虚无缥缈的环境里，从电影史上来说，这算有违师门，但从中国电影史来说，这算夹缝里求生存。
配乐做得很有水准，结合画面看起来还是很给人沉浸感
最后又拖沓又煽情又魔幻，没有这个令人打瞌睡的片尾20分钟还可以加一星，沈腾的确有点喜剧天才。黄子韬也太划水太毁形象了秃头啊
疫情之后的第一场电影，好笑就行了，感谢没让沈腾复活（沈腾真的帅了，热搜没骗我）
尝试是值得鼓励的，但最终做出来的不是各种类型的集大成，而是四不像。打灯情节把科幻彻底变成玄幻，泛滥的煽情戏码让人哭笑不得。沈马之间的感情戏真的有必要吗？把男主角写死真的有必要吗？一眼让人想起火星救援，但科幻部分没法比就不说了，居然连让人真心发笑的次数也比不上，确实叫人遗憾。
好久没有花钱看电影了 ，今次花钱坐在杜比厅的黄金位置上体验吃屎。又土又不好笑，地球上全员工具人，看完我只记住了黄子韬是一号线艺人（就这个梗我乐了一下）。这片能卖几十亿只能。。衷心祝福了！！
末日设定、宇宙太空、牛逼特效、神经科幻、地球观众（地球的戏份真的很尬）都是为沈腾搭起来的舞台。虽然有些笑点硬挠脚板心，有些泪点处心积虑，但好在没有网络梗。有几幕画面是壁纸级的诗意浪漫，从小品电影里升华成仙了。
独孤月在月球上的“积极”生活给了地球上的人们希望，独孤月绝望时，幸存者们又给予了独孤月生存的希望，相互支撑救赎的感情，看到起鸡皮疙瘩
只能说一部比莫扎特强点不多的电影。如果不是开心麻花演，如果不是暑期档，这片子会“死”的很惨。电影唯一称道的是特效做的很好。适合笑点泪点低的人看。
事先就知道科幻只是个皮囊，不能对科幻报期望，所以预期是感受前半部分的喜剧部分也挺好，为了更好地感受喜剧氛围，还特地挑了个几乎满座的厅，结果看完大失所望，全程几乎没笑，笑点有些尴尬，科幻部分也不行，所以看的不好笑也不感动，很失望
主题很烂大街，也不是什么科幻片，但就是挺好笑又带点儿温情。
开始以为是火星救援的故事设定，看了一会很快发现完全不是，这次简直是给沈腾定制的角色。感觉这次的空间站置景、宇航员服装，比流浪地球时期都进步了很多，看起来中国科幻电影的工业化水平是向前迈了一大步没错了。看完以后，免不了要振臂高呼一句：我磕的cp是真的！！（沈马一生
拙劣的笑点过于密集了，片子碎成渣渣了……但是！它不至于像这几年的大多数商业片一样让人恶心，顶多是不咋好吃，但也吃得下去。外太空这个主题太浪漫了，特效真美，我都愿意去月球来这么一遭。刻意的煽情还是给我整哭了，哭太惨了，沈腾和马丽演得挺舒服。
虽然剧本有熟悉的影子例如《独立日》，但开心麻花的气质很浓，这部电影没想到是个bad ending，我觉得挺浪漫。
中国版的火星救援
我觉得比流浪地球好看，毕竟有硬科幻的原作基础和开心麻花的喜剧元素加持，国内走到这样的创作表现还是值得欣喜的。顶流金刚鼠要火啊，但它的宇航服和头盔是怎么做出来的？要为影片的小细节点赞：全球最小的歌词字幕和彩蛋倒计时进度条！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
