剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 夔蕴和 1小时前 :

    杰夫的皮质小手,感觉很有温度

  • 战开宇 0小时前 :

    灾难设定是《沙丘》版的《后天》,一个人一条狗的设定几乎照搬了《我是传奇》,但因为一个机器人杰夫的加入,让本片从惯常的科幻动作大片模式中跳脱出来,走出了公路电影的范儿。宛如科幻版的《遗愿清单》。汤姆汉克斯上次的独角戏还是十一年前的《荒岛余生》,连造型和本片都有相似。他最后看到蝴蝶拥抱蓝天的时刻,仿佛回到《费城故事》中陶醉在音乐中不忍离世的那个他。残忍又温情。American pie这首歌用的很妙,欢快的节奏反衬苍凉的背景。

  • 东门若骞 3小时前 :

    一次是星期五,一次是杰夫;一次关于信念,一次关于信任;一次生,一次死。末世温情,大背景下的小人物,设定细节可以忽略,因为你永远可以期待汤姆汉克斯。

  • 季烨煜 0小时前 :

    美式心灵鸡汤的高级版,其实机器人就是理性的,哪有那么多人性化的理解和追求和人一样情感的过程呢?不过真的蛮可爱的,三星半。汉克斯还是那么会选剧本

  • 斯子蕙 7小时前 :

    A road trip to San Francisco with Finch. 我以为他会给千斤顶安排一个名字叫Wilson 呢。。。全片除了结尾,最让我来情绪的还有,看到他穿上自己最fancy 的白西装跟Jeff 一起坐在野外的荒芜大地上,分享人生的一次once upon a time故事, 还有看Jeff 和 狗子的戏耍。自然交接,life must go on, so does the journey ..... ps. 野外部分都是在新墨西哥州拍摄的。

  • 厉夜雪 5小时前 :

    很舒服也很有深度的末日公路片,从圣路易斯到旧金山,这一路上人类、机器人与动物三者之间的牵绊关系尤为精彩。刚刚被芬奇研发出来的高级智能机器人由于恶劣环境而被迫踏上逃离圣路易斯的道路,芬奇指引着它每一步的成长,从站立到走路,从起名到搜寻物资,有苦恼,也有欢乐。有时让人开怀大笑,也有时让人极度苦恼。机器人杰夫独立意识渐渐增强,却发现芬奇的时日已不多,当芬奇离去后,杰夫像是注入了芬奇的灵魂,与小狗一起到达了目的地金门大桥,完成了芬奇的遗愿。

  • 家晨 4小时前 :

    Ai拥有人性,那里让人热泪盈眶人性指的是真善美爱与信任,而不是大开杀戒,尔虞我诈。一人一狗一啰嗦的零件,都能让人眼眶酸滞。

  • 张康德 8小时前 :

    提出了人类与机器人良性共存的可能性。人类表现出懦弱,无知,脆弱等一系列缺点,而机器人也表现出了包容,坚强,睿智等一系列优点。特别难得的,他们还相互表达了爱和信任。。

  • 宣弘化 1小时前 :

    我最近打分真是越来越肆无忌惮了。||该说不说,这有拍成电视剧的潜质啊。是吧,《甜牙》。(~ ̄▽ ̄)~

  • 宝德泽 3小时前 :

    爱,死亡与机器人

  • 云尔柳 3小时前 :

    杰夫是芬奇的孩子,由他一夜长大开始养家。

  • 巫马听露 5小时前 :

    20220323,平平淡淡的片子好像没有高潮,如同表面平静的大海,实际蕴藏巨大的能量。独自一人静静看片,独自体验主人公芬奇害怕孤独的感觉。

  • 乾盈秀 4小时前 :

    象征着希望的太阳成为了摧毁一切生命的源头,于是汤姆汉克斯又一次诠释了captain这个角色,肩负起了寻找希望的使命!啊不对,应该是jeff啊!这片应该叫jeff啊!

  • 尔怀雁 8小时前 :

    我以为最终会探讨这样一个话题:人工智能有人权吗?只有我一个人在想如果狗狗goodyear也走了,杰夫一个人怎么办吗?

  • 嘉涵 7小时前 :

    人与人之间的不信任与敌意恐怕是比世界末日还要来的恐怖 善待比自己弱小的生命 是生命基本的感动

  • 佳树 6小时前 :

    同类型片里我始终更喜欢《我是传奇》,这一部算不上特别的好,但是也拍出了自己的特色,以机器衬托人类,对于他人的信任,亲情的传承,人类给自己所设的边界与限制,是啊,我们人类就是这么可笑的物种。可是看完又有一丝悲伤,最后释然。

  • 剑晨轩 9小时前 :

    灾难,公路,人·狗·机,Don McLean。

  • 天祜 6小时前 :

    连人都是假的,情却那么真,看得我眼泪哗哗的。很简单的情节,角色也极少,但这将近两个小时却几乎一晃而过,丝毫不觉得单调、乏味。可能会有人觉得这片子“老土”吧,但相比那些“新潮”的,我还是更欣赏这种能让我入戏、让我产生共鸣的“老土”片儿。

  • 帛雅 2小时前 :

    象征着希望的太阳成为了摧毁一切生命的源头,于是汤姆汉克斯又一次诠释了captain这个角色,肩负起了寻找希望的使命!啊不对,应该是jeff啊!这片应该叫jeff啊!

  • 振鹤 7小时前 :

    “阿甘”27年后还是那套白西装,只不过曾经的目光清澈变成了现在的老骥伏枥。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved