Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
三星不能再多了。黄叔这也算翻车吧，挑了这么个剧本，这电影照着华语版翻拍怎么翻成这幅鬼样子？一介演员，演打戏演多了就能变成这种战神吗，还尼玛carry全场，胜过警察。黄叔演丁青上瘾吗，演了从恶里拯救又演这个。话说那人质小姐姐，在鱿鱼游戏里为了叫新星的孩子而死，在这片里就一枪轰了一个叫新星的，也算是回本了……
中规中矩，忠武路工业没能让这个中国剧本焕发新意。
看完吧都不好意思多提，推荐的话是一句说不出口，我甚至觉得这么比起来，从邪恶中拯救我好像也不是不能上四，总之是很糟糕的。想说适可而止吧韩国人，别再消耗黄政民了，没有他这片儿就是一星。
黄政民演技没的说
网络，原声，94分钟。
你早点跟人家照相不就没事了。韩版改编的挺有意思，绑架的真的是黄政民本人，影片开头还给黄政民作了介绍，包括朴成雄都是出演的本人。韩国警察全是废物，最后还得影帝自己上阵。结尾还把这事又改编成电影了，心理阴影得多大啊！
“这里给男主加一场十五分钟的打戏”
重温完肉山黄政民和千代的经典对决，突然想看正版的片。几个绑匪的选角差点意思，电视剧型表演。李瑜美真好看
劫难后的片场一段实际可以深入的，然而真事改编的再改编大部分时候只能是凭空虚构，从头至尾“黄政民”只存在于这个名字上，老黄似乎并未找到或者压根就不想去思考如何扮演“自己”。
从开头就知道质量了，翻拍不成功，还得需要像王千源一样的大恶人形象，完整的故事线
why黄政民要来拍这种电影。绑架头头感觉像个变态杀人狂，一点也不像为了钱绑架人的
说是《解救吾先生》韩国版，但是改动部分已经很多了，相当于只套用了故事背景，人物关系和人物性格都重新进行了设定。光看片名和演职员表还以为黄政民要演绑匪那个角色呢，没想到他演的竟然是人质，不愧是青龙奖大钟奖双料影帝，演起人质来就没警察什么事儿了。总体来说，这样的翻拍算是青出于蓝而胜于蓝吧。
《解救吾先生》中反派角色之所以让人印象深刻一方面是王千源演技加成，另一方面是这个人物本身就有血有肉。 与《解救吾先生》相比，《人质》突出了动作戏各种追打的场面为影片增添了紧张感。但与此同时警匪之间的精彩互动少了许多，很多博弈戏份都被打戏替代。总的来说这次改编也不能说失败，但和原版相比这部《人质》也就是一部在及格线上徘徊的作品。
评分过低了
作為翻拍基本上可以說除了背景是演員被綁架以外和吾先生都基本沒關係了🚬但除去翻拍這點當原創來看還是很爽的！！！劇情和角色都很好boss夠瘋綁匪窩裏鬥還有人質自救反殺綁匪俺喜歡
遇到找你合影的人，友善一点。如果你是个明星的话。另外，韩国警察啊，一如既往的窝囊。
表扬黄政民无所不能吧，相反对比警察…… 真是一言难尽，这样的是怎么当上警察的？警匪一个人顶过一个局？智商和实力都是碾压警察……
一定是影帝级别的演员，才能撑起这样的片子。
看了这么多韩国电影，感觉韩国警察在韩国民众心里的印象应该跟国足在国人心中的印象差不多吧。
故事倒也平平无奇，黄sir演了这么多打戏，很能打挺正常的吧。就是绑匪的嚣张跋扈显得太无理，内部破裂的太快，不像是干了这么多起案件的团队应该有的。其他的也没啥说的，黄sir在模仿自己的比赛中没有拿到头奖，就离谱。可看可不看吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
