剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 仰白桃 6小时前 :

    事实上如果不是休叔,我真想给这部片子打一星,整部片子从头到尾给人一种故弄玄虚的感觉,看预告以为是悬疑科幻,后来才发现居然是无聊透顶的爱情片…故事讲得好就罢了,问题是拍得真的很无聊,节奏一团糟,故事也有点不知所云。

  • 双安春 2小时前 :

    最后一个人那么小场地干掉几十号持枪恐怖分子,太假了

  • 恒振 8小时前 :

    牛逼,动作戏设计和摄影太棒了,创造了巅峰级别的新动作片拍法,在电影史具有独特的地位。

  • 侯孤阳 9小时前 :

    說了多少遍,影視的東西就是劇本劇本劇本。打着諾蘭兒媳的旗號也只有毁了這個光環,不知道原著寫的怎麼樣,但電影拍出來是浪費了演員的專業與觀眾的時間。故事線凌亂、動機薄弱、人物蠢笨。到底電影想說甚麼,搞到最後沒看懂。

  • 弥雅爱 7小时前 :

    一镜到底的动作片还是很有看头,就是动作还不够爽。

  • 司清心 5小时前 :

    记忆叙事:科幻爱情。情节和情节之间如果没有“新质”的发生,那蒙太奇几乎失去了1+1大于2的本初含义,电影浪费了水城和记忆的科幻设定,迷乱在不知所谓的情节设定和组合关系中。各条线索分别讲一点,东拉西扯,毫无力量。

  • 勾阳飙 6小时前 :

    一镜到底是牛逼啊。但是镜头晃来晃去的,看着稍微有点晕

  • 律初兰 6小时前 :

    真·一镜到底!而且还是动作片。尽管只有1个半小时的片长。但确实已经非常之厉害了!没有特效、没有替身,斯科特·阿金斯可能一招一式都是自己亲自上阵的。虽然只是演戏,但这种90分钟级别的动作戏一气呵成的拍完,必须得佩服一下编导演全体人员的专业能力、专业精神,以及堪比职业运动员的体能、体力!

  • 夕康复 4小时前 :

    最后一个人那么小场地干掉几十号持枪恐怖分子,太假了

  • 励意智 8小时前 :

    小成本,无脑剧情,一帮人再玩CQB。就看兔兔兔…

  • 寒婧 1小时前 :

    感觉电影挺多bage,最后那个走廊枪战,非要找一个人绑炸弹才能攻吗,还有那个囚犯,明明那么多时间,把囚服也脱了不就不会死

  • 彭冰海 2小时前 :

    一向觉得无论那种摄影方式和技巧,都是服务于故事本身,一旦重点聚焦于一镜到底的动作片如何厉害,那可想而知,作品的故事本身是如何的不咋样,何况动作戏也挺拉跨的。

  • 居荌荌 5小时前 :

    不算有新意的设定,但拍得挺有趣,要说每个人都“怀旧”也算一直在点题,但总觉得好像没有上升到更高层面。很美,在荧幕上看肯定体验更好,有很多蒙太奇都太殇了,唉。但是剧本逻辑真的太拉(怎么没让诺兰弟弟帮忙改改),有些情节真的很奇怪,吴彦祖的中文台词确实够shabi,可惜了

  • 寒鑫 9小时前 :

    枪械射击效果太差了,知道是低成本,但是这实在说不过去

  • 仪玉轩 0小时前 :

    以一当百

  • 嘉涵 0小时前 :

    我靠!一人干几百人的神勇无敌,咋就没人说这美版战狼了呢?怎么干都是别人死,打的倒是很爽,剧情就瞎鸡巴扯!

  • 承乐康 1小时前 :

    动作枪战场面确实拍的很有亮点,场景调动和镜头运用很考验导演思路,但故事方面很平淡无趣,这种片本身都偏实验感,也就这样了吧

  • 施琴雪 7小时前 :

    娱乐性很强,有过肩视角游戏的感觉,一镜到底的调度比《狂武藏》好太多,看完想给后者打两星。

  • 妫又亦 2小时前 :

    作为小成本的动作枪战片,本片还是很良心。故事脉络很简单,一队海豹在执行押送人犯过程中与试图抢夺人员的恐怖分子进行正面遭遇战,其间战斗场面真实刺激,打斗干净利落,攻防策略、战术动作,冷兵器及枪械处理等等细节都有模有样,看上去挺专业。而一镜到底的拍摄也让全片代入感很强,熟悉FPS的玩家应该感觉非常亲切,全片看下来发生战斗类似关塔那摩的监狱基地就像是真人射击游戏的地图,里面各种建筑、障碍物、地形应有尽有。到后期男主的主角光环虽然强烈耀眼,整体来说还是基本符合常理,没有太反人类的bug逻辑,只可惜那美女分析员挂得挺郁闷,不过显得片子真实感更强。看着一波波恐怖分子送人头,观众应该有种FPS游戏通关的快感。全片节奏紧凑,场面爽快,当成爽片看看也可以,

  • 佟密思 8小时前 :

    打斗枪战都挺不错,全片一镜到底是亮点,真牛!一部合格的爆米花电影

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved