Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
蛮有趣，原以为是北野武奋斗史，结果是师生情
整片节奏有些奇怪，感觉就只是一场战役…另外如果背景放在抗日战争我还能共情一些，放在抗美援朝……
疫情是一场战争，一场和资本主义，帝国主义，修正主义，官僚主义的斗争，坚决和与病毒共存的投降主义观点斗争到底！
剧情紧凑 表达克制 细节到位 完成度高
就非常有意思的主题和成片风格，各种相反的元素碰撞，表达的真情是真真情，温情也是恰到好处。
4- “不要被人笑，而是逗他们笑。不要讨好观众，要由你告诉他们什么才是有趣。”这份师徒情，太珍贵。
好看的战争片基本板，大错没有，瑕疵挺让我不舒服的。中美双方的荧幕形象反差很大，中方是有家人的青年，美方关注个人荣誉。结尾表明这是个纯虚构的故事，假而爽。我的历史观来到今天，太需要把人当人了，拿掉区分、直面人性，是我更期待看到的
再现红色记忆，伟大的战争，曾被遗忘，终究要被镌刻进我们的基因。
除了子弹时间特效不行以为，我觉得电影完成度很高，没有喊口号，但是有真情实感
最后连长点名那段哭死我了……
战争片聚焦于小人物的细腻感情，敌我拉锯战以单个人数为单位紧追比分，手撕一只鬼子的代价可能是被鬼子手撕两个我方战友，扣人心弦的效果就出来了。
最后去送别师傅那一段，拍的最棒，有笑有泪的好电影。
如果是从歌颂大国强国这片可能不如以往同类型电影，如果从警示战争的残酷和展示英雄的伟大来讲，这片强过近期所有讲朝鲜战场的电影。
4、伟大的并不是梦想，而是那些为了实现梦想的、永不停歇的奋斗！
搞笑艺人，不是被别人笑，是要逗人笑！一部电影，两种人生。北野武的师生情，让人老泪纵横。
北野武是94年出车祸才面瘫的，这电影74年也在模仿面瘫脸抽？请问导演是哪里有点问题吗？及其出戏的表演点。
抗美援朝我们在双方装备和补给悬殊巨大的情况下，靠着“小米➕步枪”，靠着志愿军的坚持，看着志愿军的生命赢得的。《狙击手》由小见大，展现出战争的残酷，立意很好。过分渲染甚至略显刻意的情感是主旋律电影最大的问题，该片也未能逃脱这个俗套。
短小精悍，聚焦于小人物，小事件，这样真的能够做到完成度很高。但是后来那个小狙击手，真的就能马上神枪手上身吗？小哭包真的就能在老父亲一样的班长牺牲之后马上整理好自己的情绪，调整作战姿态吗？主角光环有点浓厚。小哭包到后来的转变缺少一些铺垫(有但不够)。并且，我感觉有视角上的转换，前部分主角是刘文武，后面他牺牲之后主角才是小哭包。为什么要这样？好像现在我国主旋律战争片都喜欢刻画小兵的成长，隔壁《水门桥》也是，易烊千玺的戏份不算多也不算出彩，顶多算个见证者，参与者，幸存者。这样第三人称的视角，放在这样煽情的战争片里真的好吗？
大历史下小人物一样触动人心，章宇的表现很出彩，首尾的点名相互照应
穿西装的模样太帅了，感觉有点像太宰治啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
