A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
现在对歌舞片的要求是必须歌曲要很catchy才行，就看完不记得里面的旋律
如果是原卡，那就是10分。我不是很明白，明明这几个演员也不是很有名，用这钱请原卡不行吗。不过Hugo和hedge的演员虽然唱得不好但是演技杠杠的，很喜欢他俩。看到Dean的时候麦艾斯麦艾斯，我命令导演要么换人演要么把Jamie邀请Dean跳舞的片段删掉。惊艳的部分应该是前几首歌的炸裂的视觉效果和John McCrea的出场。哭了几次。情节改动得蛮好，新歌也不错。
主演演技一般唱功一般。这个dean看起来一点都不mean，太蠢笨了… anyways，最好的一版是OLC。
开始还不错，最后烂尾了。女主太让人调戏了，拍多了那种片，演动作片也总让人想起那种场面。男主还是犯罪都市让人恨。
创意可以，就是前半部没有交代感觉乱七八糟。后面大开杀戒，血腥暴力还挺过瘾
在近期发行的几部音乐剧改编的电影中算中上水平，但还是不及西区官摄好看。Pritti的音色略显单薄，两首独唱的力道总感觉差了点。改编过程中删歌加歌什么的在所难免，但用This Was Me取代The Legend of Loco Chanel是全片最大的槽点。片尾第一次见到Jamie原型，变装后有些镜头神似Saoirse Ronan (我是罗南粉)。
额。。。很一般，甚至有点差劲的科幻啊。。。设定全在一个泰国毒品上？？！然后可以灵魂穿越？？关键是还准准的12小时一次？？这都是什么跟什么嘛。。越到后面越扯啊。。。所以那个要饭的作用是？
动不动就是一个人杀一个公司的人，韩国动作片已经没有新意了，换个套路吧。
既然可以灵魂附体在场的每一个人，那就差她媳妇了……最后他俩不会合为一体了吧？
理查德格兰特真的好适合这种角色，全片最佳片段就是他讲述那段心酸往事的老旧式录影了吧，牙叔，戴安娜王妃……一众icon，就是那时的他们的精神支柱吧。
故事讲的有点乱、有点无聊，女主这部里面不出彩。
开篇引人入胜，但是用新式d填坑，这就玄幻了，有这种奇效的应该不属于d行列了吧。开始填坑后的剧情就有点牵强无趣了。乞丐大叔给个赞
难看到爆炸，歌不好听剧情稀烂，转折莫名其妙的，求求音乐剧改编成电影的话，好好修修剧本吧？生搬硬套音乐剧剧本真的逻辑转折都特别生硬。 严重怀疑LGBT+人群看完这片更不敢出柜了吧。
【2022.05.10】还好吧！中规中矩，没有什么特别的，还算看得过去。
不是那么多人，他们都是同一个人。设定还挺不错的，嗑药嗑出了灵魂转移的能力也是蛮厉害的
电影版比dear even Hansen 好，足球场一幕喜欢。没有了loco Chanel 的背景故事那段有点可惜。剧场版yyds
设定很酷炫, 感觉可以玩出什么新花样, 可惜故事讲的让人一头雾水, 最后也强行往毒品上套...女主不错.
Everybody's talking about Jamie.
灵魂脱离者 什么元素都有，就是很难看进去。可能是脸盲，真的分不清开篇变来变去到底是不是同一个人。剧本里应该写清楚了谁是谁，拍出来就不知道谁是谁了。而且已经有了借身体的概念，还做成悬念一直拖到结尾。不知道这几年韩国电影怎么了。
这灵魂这么跳动法，第二次看也是看到困啦总算看完。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
