Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
jeff做的非常真实及高科技，但是故事实在太老套，未来版的荒岛余生，特别是蝴蝶，刻意到尴尬
从gump到拯救大兵 到荒岛 再到如今 hanks没有让人失望过 不过这年头末日题材的电影真多 而且感觉上 人类又走到一个要重启的时间点了
除了短暂的回忆场景中的人物，以及未见其人的第二辆车，以及狗和蝴蝶，全片其实只有一个传统意义上的演员。
因为Human Contradiction吗
我们都终将老去，唯一可以留给孩子的是教予一生的经验，和经历的故事。
芬奇给杰夫的设定是帮助Goodyear，死前的愿望也是一样他们能友好相处。
cue了《我，机器人》《荒岛余生》《阿甘正传》，公路片西部片的味道拍的不错。
时隔多年，汉克斯老了，荒岛余生的排球变成了碎嘴自作主张的Ai机器人，唯一不变的是是那份孤独。
2. 瓦力也没有那么坚牢，一跌就散，遇不到他的EVA。
不要轻视人的创造力，更不要低估人的破坏力。（人文科幻 大抵如此 ）
“有机器人的电影都不差”，INTP如是说。
印度这些年的不少片让我们这边的观影者感慨：敢拍。我觉得更可贵的是，能审批通过，能上映让全国全世界的人看到——有了这样制度的前提，制片方到导演到团队，不存在“敢不敢”的问题。
更适合归类到奇幻片，主旨很简单：关爱空巢老人。拍成短片就行了。
看汤姆老爹一步步把机器人培养成才，就像把孩子教养成人一样让人感动，特别是最后机器人和狗子一起和谐生活的时候更让人感动，孤独又温馨的感动。片子的灾难情形设想让人震撼，又让人觉得苍凉孤苦，这种悲感并不是人类自己造成的，而是太阳造成的，虽然这样的设想让人心里些许安慰，但也让人慑怕于破坏了臭氧层的危机后果。
杰夫的皮质小手，感觉很有温度
世界末日再可怕也可怕不过生老病死，所以我们要尽情享受每一天的阳光啊！
LOVED BY GOODYEAR AND JEFF.”This is living."又浪漫又伤心 呜呜呜o(╥﹏╥)o
3、故事的背景是末日时代，世界和人性几乎都崩塌了。然而，在汉克斯、那只狗狗，还有那个机器人Jeff身上，我却再一次感受到人性的温暖，看到了未来世界的希望。
灾难设定是《沙丘》版的《后天》，一个人一条狗的设定几乎照搬了《我是传奇》，但因为一个机器人杰夫的加入，让本片从惯常的科幻动作大片模式中跳脱出来，走出了公路电影的范儿。宛如科幻版的《遗愿清单》。汤姆汉克斯上次的独角戏还是十一年前的《荒岛余生》，连造型和本片都有相似。他最后看到蝴蝶拥抱蓝天的时刻，仿佛回到《费城故事》中陶醉在音乐中不忍离世的那个他。残忍又温情。American pie这首歌用的很妙，欢快的节奏反衬苍凉的背景。
只能说是对汤姆汉克斯的爱才能看得下去并打个4星。美术和摄影的确非常壮美，其余的，真的就太平淡，故事太四平八稳毫无冲突和惊喜，说是科幻奇幻不如说这是一部文艺童话电影。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
