Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
浪费了ADA的表演，动作戏完全不如ADA在007的那几分钟有意思。其他更是乏善可陈。
看完我桃这个造型，我感觉桃总才应该是牙叔的第一人选
Ryan Gosling演谍战戏真的加分不少，剧情有点拉了，可是场面帅啊，无人机呼啸而过。生活离不开007 :D
越到后面越无聊 Chris Evans做反派反而有点惊喜
罗素兄弟也只会玩这一套了，结局有点狗尾续貂。
属于比较无聊的那类猛男啪啪啪，虽然从头打到尾，但一点疼感都没有，把一个人整的太神了就没意思了，而且太需要电影院，在家看这个实在太提不起兴致。这么cue星期四，是肯德基入股了吗
电影的投入也不小，眼花缭乱地在全世界转场。看高司令和美队两大型男对战也真是过瘾啊！剧情比较简单，反水间谍被全世界追杀，传统套路。最精彩的是中间布拉格街道一战，精彩万分，足以载入动作片史册！只可惜高潮来得早了点，后面的戏就有点没味道了，尤其是结尾，真是无语，就死了个美队，反派啥事没有同，这算什么啊？明明应该小黑反派下台，美女主管上位代替成为新反派啊！
罗素兄弟确实掌握了超英类型片的精髓，一个杰森伯恩的故事拍出了超英的感觉，但影片一直在好看和不好看之间反复横跳，大量不必要的航拍镜头和无趣的喜剧桥段，以及屏幕上已经看腻的经典反派、杀手形象，更要命的是有一个一点都不爽的结局。if you wanna make a sequel, at least make the first one decent.
找来克里斯·埃文斯当反派却不给他设计几场有力的动作戏，就让他演个弱智疯子，这样的神仙操作还出自拍出了美队2的罗素兄弟
扯。夸张。除了爆米花就是爆米花。不过可以看。剧情老套。旅游片
两星给的是K Joi重聚 古巴美人也能胜任搏斗场面太大开眼界
感觉这种情绪不稳定的快餐电影看多了，会对我的一些……呃……美好的品格，乃至灵魂造成影响。
能看出投资很大，花费很高。但是钱都没用到地方上，只为了一味追求大场面，而忘了最重要的
高司令变身人狠话不多的硬汉感觉还不错，话唠反派的造型Freddie含量太高，以至于看完电影到豆瓣页面才发现他是美队。
噗哈哈笑死，某天天自诩用心演戏的刻苦男演员演技又被人正面爆了。没事，输给高司令不丢人/AdA这回被艳压了？我觉得她跟Jessica互换角色没准会好看点
超出我预料，比红色通缉令好太多了。就冲开头曼谷“炸裂”的画面色彩、高司令空中肉搏降落土耳其+铲平布拉格这三段，没有功劳也有苦劳，拿个今年最有诚意动作片总行吧（虽然没有这奖项）。P.S. 说实在的我也是第一次见人在爆竹中打架还打得这么唯美的。开头霓虹色彩+亚洲氛围一出，恍惚间差点以为这是007皇家赌场澳门取景地or天幕杀机里的我大魔都。Anyway不管哪方面这部都吊打红通，作为这种大投资商业片，不用拿到古今中外历史长河去比，跟自己比就行了。要啥自行车。
疫情期间，就需要这样一部环游世界的片子（手动狗头
竟然有两个小时，看了一些平平无奇的内容。很难相信这个阵容没有出彩的地方。美队真的不在意自己的颜值，心疼一下我自己。
就挺好看，虽然剧情弱了点，但看高司令装逼还是挺爽的。
阵容真的还蛮吊的 就是这个穿梭机转场是我没想到的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
