Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
看，那就是你们的工作为这座城市做的贡献！奴隶主义是帝国主义的最高阶段。
ᐈ这个优秀的电影，没有任何多余的音效，最真实的生活投影
从处女作“苏格拉底”就能感受到这个导演追求纪录的影像风格，难得的是连上一部的主演都保留了，真长情啊...
黑化，是每个人必经的过程。
可能在巴西，穷人想改变命运，踢球是最实际的选择。
如果不考虑政治因素，这片子前1个小时可以看，后面基本上属于狗尾续貂，愣是要升华主题，但实际矛盾和高潮已经错过，1个小时候就会显得很尴尬。但如果加上政治因素……你就看这个名字，就知道棒子们想干啥了
这电影拍的很真实，很多人都为了利益活成了自己曾讨厌的样子
学渣在扫地僧的帮助下独立奋强…又扯到南北关系。
无尽的深渊，我们生来是幸运的，幸运的生活在中国这个全世界最安定的国家，幸运的出生在没有那么底层的家庭，希望社会能够越来越安定，希望无论在做什么决定的时候一定要多一些心眼，任何事情有担心才是正常的，希望这样的深渊越来越少
不疼不痒，当一种反传统结局成了传统时，它不仅不让人眼前一亮，反而很反传统
黎曼猜想还没被证明，一百万奖金倒是真的；培养数学兴趣不如看《数学之美》。
套路还是蛮重的，一个家境贫寒的穷小子被人霸凌，遇到一个扫地僧，学会了绝世武功绝地翻身的故事，只不过这个绝世武功是数学而已，再加上政治背景，看起来很有新意。最感动的是李克成说的那句话：学数学需要的是勇气，是敢于说“真的挺难的，我明天再试一试吧”的勇气。五星打给男主角崔岷植。
革命不彻底就是这揍性。
除了矫情还是矫情，当初爱因斯坦去搞原子弹，也没这么多屁话啊，白左当道真是邪恶。
老戏骨风范依旧。
引起生理性不适的**电影，*他*的叛国丧子自闭扫地僧跟受气包单亲小奶狗的组合看过八百遍了暂且不提，能不能有点guts别**拽着南北矛盾就当国家名片啊，搁这整了个《闻香识女人》+《死亡诗社》+《心灵捕手》的究极缝合怪，**导演和脑瘫投资人是不是以为只要有崔珉植哪怕是配上圣光滤镜和不知所云的诗意（脑浆）台词也能碰瓷阿尔帕西诺？不怕瞎眼老教父拄着盲棍带着喷火器把你*骨灰都扬了？这样的电影也能得奖**的朴赞郁李沧东要连夜拿硫酸把家里奖杯擦一遍。拙劣的模仿！
作为社会底层的人，你是顺从还是反叛？是舔狗还是抗争？命运一直都在自己的脚下，就看自己怎么走？
我想，我对数学，数字的一切热爱就是从高中被开始剥夺的吧。
演技都还不错 剧情虽然俗套但还蛮温暖的 被师徒俩的互相治愈的情感给感动到了
角色的转变就是这么自然，所以不要相信小地方的人当了官会为小地方的人谋福利，可能压榨的更恶劣。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
