Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
非常反类型的神偷片 这部影片基本只关注了开锁这件事本身 以及锁背后设计者的故事与尼伯龙根的指环相关典故 整个情感构建也基于此 甚至可以说这是一部偷盗世界中的国家宝藏 这个故事只是为了揭开一段传奇 呈现一个历史 偷盗不是目的 挑战无法逾越的高峰才是 主角对开锁的痴迷就像登山片对攀登的痴迷 为何要征服高山 因为山就在那里 所以整个电影挺理想主义和浪漫主义的
看到最后才意识到他是活死人军团里的一份子。不带脑子的盗贼片，开再难的保险柜也是全靠耳朵
为什么每个叫Gwen的人角色都太温柔到让人丧失理智o(︶︿︶)o
就很普通的爽片，设定各司其职，缺一不可，但最终呈现出来却只有锁匠牛逼！结局不太喜欢。
这奈飞把电影拍成连续剧的感觉，虽然画面很精美，但是观感反而粗糙了。
人家用一生打造的锁子 你一个油管博主三下五除二就破解了？？
三颗星最多了。题材挺好的，前面太啰嗦，与主线没关系的话太浪费时间了。主角塑造缺点什么，比如家庭背景，与为何迷恋开锁。男女主之恋，可有可无。尴尬啊。
这不比《活死人军团》得劲很多了。老套归老套，但是在正传的衬托下，拉胯之处也显得完整清晰了，这叫扎导情何以堪。
画面不错，这个年代了拍这种组团偷盗的还这么多问题，也真是勉强三星了。
剧情有其可取之处，开保险箱和尼伯龙根的指环拉上关系还是让人感兴趣的，可惜，也就只有这些了，毕竟娱乐片关键还是要节奏，而且还是在男女主角本身魅力还不足的情况下。
看到片尾，是要告诉我还有续集吗？
总体3⭐，个人体验4⭐吧。
人物设计有点意思。
锁匠之神，做了四个绝世保险柜，最后一个把自己锁了起来。现代，有个伙计专门研究开保险柜，被一个盗窃团伙看中，开始了寻找并破解“指环”系列保险柜的旅程。
有点儿意思，但也就只是有一点，不过女主和女配我可太喜欢了！属于是顶级辣妹了。
但是不感觉毫无剧情么？平淡无味，为了凑而凑....
难得全程跳着看。开锁毫无乐趣。PC和感情戏让人生厌。这就是所谓的浪费设定吧。
看着全程很刺激，实际看下来一直冷漠脸...强行夸大主角三人团的能力..槽点很多，看的德语配音硬是看完了...
这个套路的剧看得实在太多，本剧的高明之处在于给保险箱加背景从而拔高盗窃行为，奈何基本实在无趣，男主挺抖森的
再多的过去也无法抗拒荷尔蒙的吸引。输赢早就注定。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
