Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
漫画家的情感复仇，切入点挺有趣但不是我会喜欢的电影题材
前面有多精彩，结尾就让人多失望，人物转折和逻辑完全看不到，太低幼了，结尾真的是为了结束而结束，真不敢相信是《超能陆战队》和《海洋奇缘》导演的作品，这么差直接上流媒体一点也不冤。
太可爱了……我是说海兽。故事是很简单的，只是没想到帝王号戏份这么少，这个动画做得太精致了！！
#启明会观影节#9/10。神奇！可以说是独属于日本这个国度的电影，换别的国家的导演、演员来根本驾驭不了这部片。
画面人物，像疯狂原始人那边直接拉过来用的，换了身衣服与背景。。。
漫画现实虚实结合的形式有趣，结尾任命丈夫作画来连载妻子新恋情，设定很不错哦
丈夫在现实和漫画虚构之间不停猜测徘徊，错过了原谅的时机，说再多，也没用了。
把主角人设搞得这么讨人厌是不太想让人看吗？这小孩一说话就招人烦呐，看着剧情也是套训龙的路子
挺好玩的、分不清是漫画还是现实。老师原来指的是驾校教练，后来才知道，原来是她老公，
哈哈哈哈知道为啥有那么多人打四星了，这个结局真漂亮！~（但是中间也太慢了啊喂！！！！）#所以为啥豆瓣没有三星半强烈呼吁改为百分制#
看到小女孩出现就猜到了是环保主题 不能说不好 故事讲的比较完整 就是有的梗太旧了 但是确实 人类在毁灭整个地球
哈哈哈哈知道为啥有那么多人打四星了，这个结局真漂亮！~（但是中间也太慢了啊喂！！！！）#所以为啥豆瓣没有三星半强烈呼吁改为百分制#
动画制作都很好，就是情节的可预测性太强了。
看前面以为是狗血无聊的剧情，后面柄本佑变身受气小媳妇就爱上了，加上漫画画的也太好看了！主角两位很有cp感
这才是“大女主爽文”，太精彩了！日式女性复仇题材，画面很小清新（还有好看的漫画加持），配乐其实有点惊悚片的感觉，整体还是挺奇特的～剧本结构也很有意思～好久没看这么好看的新片了～
和藤本最近的再见绘梨异曲同工。但是一个是漫画能做到的，一个则是电影能做到的。
小红和小蓝好可爱啊！剧情方面不做解释，基本都是这种套路…
故事性太牛逼了
奈绪好美~！她这个角色的性格有点像我…哈哈哈哈 不会为了男人烦心 又很无所谓 又肉食女 又不怕出手~也不会道德谴责自己
片尾反转还挺好玩 其他的转换有些生硬 ps.日本驾校师傅这么好脾气？？？？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
