Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.
刨除印度式刻意的拍摄方式，剧情节奏再快点会更好，当然，我们是拍不出来的。
假如没看过《控方证人》和《误杀瞒天记》我一定会觉得是佳作
一开始以为是个社会电影，后来以为是女性电影，再后来发现是政治电影，最后知道是复仇电影。导演手法娴熟，没有歌舞但有慢动作mv。反转的有点累，不是很喜欢。
希望印度以后再也没有这种现实题材可以参考。
一部我在简中边偷乐边等续集的电影，导演别逼我求你。
只有50分钟的剧场版《夏目友人帐》，浓缩了两个故事，精致又温馨。
纯粹纯心纯情，接纳所有情绪，接纳世界，接纳自己。故事一，工作上那卑微的自我表现，故事二，对朋友所拥有能力的羡慕… 催泪片尾曲奏响，莫名很悲伤，也许是因为可以悲伤的东西太多了。短短的好电影。
媒体确认真相，警察执法，社会还会向着更好的方向发展吗？
印度又一部批判体制的电影，敢于发声的电影，对于热点社会议题没有进行更深层次的探讨，好在讲故事的手法，角色的反转，还能吸引人看下去。前面半个小时的处理不太好，为了后面法庭戏的反转模糊了故事，又想调动大众情绪，总是情绪先于故事，很难让人共情。
（８／１０）两个独立的故事。三筱终于有专属篇章了。
刨除印度式刻意的拍摄方式，剧情节奏再快点会更好，当然，我们是拍不出来的。
高分不是来自于电影本身，而是来自于现实角色的带入。
将近3个小时，真的太长太长了。不得不说印度真的很敢拍啊，他们难道没有那种类似广电总局的存在吗？
电影时长真可以，本片最厉害的主人公电影演一多半了才出场。高分印度电影近年来的套路就是:通过应接不暇的神反转，埋伏足够多的隐喻，进而拔高电影的整体立意。最后被轰炸了几个小时脑细胞的观影者不得不感叹:看着虽然累但电影还是牛叉的。PS:本片适合放暑假的师生细品。😅😅😅
分给题材，叙事和节奏太乱了。160多分钟电影太冗长，前面一个小时太慢了，铺垫过长了，要素过多，一个都没讲明白。只能说印度电影都比我们敢拍。
树干是极其简单的，即便不用电锯，两个人你拉我拽，配合着用木锯也能很快就把树干放倒。
1. 电影是好电影，题材由点及面涉及很多热点话题（很难不联想到我国一些事，所以你的国家我的国家大家都一样）情节跌宕多重反转，法庭戏不少台词都是能截图永留存的水平，缺点也有，时长疲惫，音乐铺得太满（毕竟印度电影）；2.“一个国家的尊严等同于它给女性的尊严”（道理都懂但我就是不改系列）；3.法律是道德的底线，刑法是法律的底线，然而这中间还有一条隐形的线叫程序正义，可迟来的正义还算得上正义吗；4.你以为的事实有时只是别人想让你看到的事实，无论哪个时代哪个国家，媒体都应该是真相的传声筒而非政治的喉舌；5.年轻人切忌过度激进或温水煮蛙，任何时候都不要急着站队，有时间多学习，不要在微博自诩判官；6.每每看到别的国家拍出这样的电影，我们总是会思考我国的审查与尺度并痛恨薛定谔的404（叹气）；7.陈思诚👌
剧情剧情 这就是我想要的剧情，看的我热血沸腾。
配乐和节奏不大好。但主旨很棒。看到了很多相似的影子
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
