Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
杨子荣见个座山雕还要献先遣图，这边法国老黑空着手就去投奔格林德沃了。逗你玩一样被接纳，逗你玩一样委以重任，逗你玩一样成功反水，一个人一转身干掉一条街黑巫师给我看笑了。
看完2之後，製作團隊你們自己想想，1到底是怎麼上映的😂 2光畫風可愛漂亮就贏了一大截😂
数学最需要什么？聪明？努力？会让人接下来就放弃，真正需要的是：勇气。
不难被一些标准结构化下的真诚所吸引 数学的美如果没法口述 那么四指联弹出一首pai曲不是很浪漫？一个固执 孤僻 灵魂已死的丧子老人被一个真诚善良对待数学认真的孩子所打动。这就是一件小事而引起的人的生活上精神上的变化和成长。看完很暖心 忘年交动人。
如果单看师生关系和对教育的探讨的话，这绝对是一部不错的佳作，可惜当片中引入了南北问题，无论把教授孩子的死归咎于朝鲜还是教授本身，其实都不是很合适。但愿国内将来才能知道自己的教育改革失败得多么彻底。最后片中女主性格好阳光、好可爱啊！
崔叔的演讲好尴尬。和数学其实没啥关系，“不相信未证明之事”的心灵鸡汤，俗套的青春成长励志电影，掺杂着诸如韩半岛世界中心、南北韩意识形态之争之类的奇谈怪论。“世界是由音乐的音符组成的，也是由数学公式组成的。人们可以选择自己最擅长的数学或音乐的方法去认识和探究未知的世界。”
如果单看师生关系和对教育的探讨的话，这绝对是一部不错的佳作，可惜当片中引入了南北问题，无论把教授孩子的死归咎于朝鲜还是教授本身，其实都不是很合适。但愿国内将来才能知道自己的教育改革失败得多么彻底。最后片中女主性格好阳光、好可爱啊！
麦一出场还是拔叔那味儿 上部德普一出场就是格林德沃
角度很刁钻 动物没有美和丑 都是被人定义的 这件事我要从小就教给孩子们
心灵鸡汤。韩国电影，即使这样完全浪漫化的商业片，也能有沉重和打动的力量
我，一个刚正不阿的格兰芬多，真的长了对大卫椰子和华纳高管全体阿瓦达啃大瓜的心。
但是韵味能感动人很久很久
这次啃生肉的感觉还不错。对于数学的坚持，究竟是什么？问题摆在这里，会有不同的回答。可是，谁能遇到像李教授这样的人呢？那么通俗的讲解数学。所以，注定大多数人不会成为지우，而数学只能是一门枯燥难懂的学科。지우深夜学习的过程，想起了悟空学艺。最后在礼堂，李教授从口袋里拿出笔，眼前出现的是《特工》里李明云向朴皙映晃动的劳力士，忍不住想笑。因为崔岷植加一星。
剧情比较套路，，不过小鹿叔叔很稳，新人演员也很不错，喜欢电影里的女孩子！
还是那个巨大而无法弥补的毛病：所有的场景灯光道具服装等等都非常精致，但就是上气不接下气讲不好一个故事。
蛇蛇太可爱了！考拉最后加入他们逃亡的大家庭真是意想不到。期待以后去澳洲的旅行呀
1.学习。学生学的好，跟啥有关系，这个千人千解。金老师这样的人不少，职称，比赛，辅导班，谋生，升职。兴趣激发很少。
哦，对了这部剧让人受不了的一点就是充满了精英分子对底层虚伪的关怀
这个电影本来故事就挺薄弱的，本来可以更煽情的，崔岷植的演技还是有触感的。
居然还挺好看的😂 丑东西保护协会口号太可了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
