Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
三星半，有意思的故事和人物关系，演的也挺好的，只是拍的很一般，隐秘却深刻的伤口以及暗流涌动的悬疑应该还可以结合的更好，音乐也不搭所以有点适得其反的意思，结尾无疾而终，感觉导演让主角的人生停留在了多年以前回家的时刻，之后便是空白。 lots of things haven’t been thought through【但Ed Harris怎么可以这么帅我的妈耶我好喜欢他
除了音乐，电影真的无聊，这俩货在哪个时代，哪个国家都是作死，不值得同情
3.5/5，对于处女作还说还是很不错的~ 镜头语言上太依赖超特写来营造暧昧恍惚的状态。
2022年5月5日，GV Suntec。 音乐好听，剧情不太投入，我还是很困😭 现在工作日不适合看电影
BGM的妙用让本片处在一个回忆迷幻的时代里。后面接着呼朋引伴看完，每次这种不经意地连着看完两部电影形成的对比总会发现残酷的现实，在观众对本片的诸多挑剔，放到呼朋引伴上简直可笑得如出一辙，甚至那片都不像一个正经长片啊，但大家宁愿看黑白色的华金满脸胡渣，而对科尔曼关于母亲的痛苦，麻木不仁，这不是电影的现状，这是如今观众的现状。
同届威尼斯的这部更配《平行母亲》的片名。多种母性具象在不同时空 平行剪辑中形成对照，娃娃-红杏出墙的欢愉；观影-罔顾家室的独食；水蛭-偷欢后的负作用；松果-遭遇惩戒的痛楚……隐喻借代一一对应女主内心对曾经迷失母性的内疚和愧对。梦魇往事主题的电影做不出特定的花样就不好看了，不过很显主角的演技，《算牌人》是这样，这部也一样。
#启明会观影节#6/10。前面可以，后面就泄了。主要还是因为导演水平不行，太愚蠢了！逮着匹配剪辑用起来没完不说，还拍那么多暧昧不清的镜头，要做甚？
台湾乡土味很浓，充斥着少年的无知无助自我迷失的电影，最后阿国死了虽然很伤感又觉得情理之中，原声带真的长出了那一代少年的迷失。嗯，从某方面来说很有种中国版猜火车的感觉。
剧情有些空泛，几位英法意半老徐娘东拼西凑，幸好有埃德-哈里斯提振一下 。
老罗和林强，老侯与高捷，蔡振南与伍佰，颜正国与谭志刚，史上最牛的阵容！《南国》的前奏曲，却更加绝望！
m2201：开始以旁观者观望别人的幸福，挺感触。希腊线偏弱。奥利维亚和杰西演技赞。插曲《Let Me Tell You All About It》、《livin on a prayer》、《Stala》/Monika
有点奇妙，昨晚刚看了时时刻刻，两部都有描画束缚于家庭中的女性心灵上的困境，选择离开令人窒息的生活是无奈不舍的不负责之举，也是肆意活出自我的必然选择，正如时时刻刻最后所说“当你别无选择时再后悔当初做的决定已毫无意义”，重要的是与过去的自己和解。
还不错，全程的基调都很压抑令人窒息，中间出去上了个厕所感觉到一些解放，然后回到影厅里这种威压立刻又回来了。但拍摄和氛围都很成功，不是很能理解主角的一些行为，为什么拿走那个娃娃，是想要一次重来的机会吗？是因为自己心爱的娃娃（暗指一部分的青春生命）被女儿毁掉所以想重新找回来吗？还是因为想让那一家人也受到自己当年受到的折磨？但明明可以说谎说自己把娃娃找回来了，为什么要告诉她实话说是自己拿走。
影像的陈词滥调无法掩盖女性体验的意义，但相较同类型的《从不很少有时总是》却显得过于断裂：感觉逐渐让位于肢体记忆，飘移的手持于是只能成为一种标准而丧失了自由投注的力量
——在二十出头的年纪里糊里糊涂地组建一个家庭，在年近五十的年纪里莫名其妙地结束一生，不荒诞，很自由。
事实证明，伍佰的歌真适合去酒馆听。
彼得萨斯加德还有意大利那个女演员怎么老成这样了？！震惊。。
看上去只是拍给当妈的人看的。这48？？sorry我一眼看去以为快60了…
女性在逐渐发现母亲并不是一个女人必须要经历的人生阶段 并且女性创作者也开始不断表现这个观点 女性的中年困境似乎也因为母亲的身份而天然地拥有了更多的层次//新生儿带来的喜悦感仿佛是某个都市传说的结尾 怀孕生产育儿和新任母亲的身心痛苦越来越被透明化 我们终于不再无视那只房间里的大象
不是友情岁月，不是乱世巨星，台湾黑帮片是块警示牌，是船过水无痕，是雨那么大，像悲伤，是林强伍佰罗大佑的台语摇滚，是捷哥。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
