Volker Schlöndorff transposes Bertolt Brecht’s late-expressionist work to latter-day 1969. Poet and anarchist Baal lives in an attic and reads his poems to cab drivers. At first feted and later rejected by bourgeois society, Baal roams through forests and along motorways, greedy for schnapps, cigarettes, women and men: ‘You have to let out the beast, let him out into the sunlight.’ After impregnating a young actress he soon comes to regard her as a millstone round his neck. He stabs a friend to death and dies alone. ‘You are useless, mangy and wild, you beast, you crawl through the lowest boughs of the tree.’
The film takes youthful impetuousness and hatred of oppression as its subject and also ponders the cult of genius and sexual morals. Rainer Werner Fassbinder simultaneously plays both Baal and himself and is surrounded by many actors who were later to perform in his own films. After the film was broadcast on West German television, Brecht’s widow Helene Weigel prohibited any further screenings, arguing that the social circumstances engendering Baal’s rebelliousness had not been adequately explained.
想象出来的场景都拍不好，
媒体家人家长警察几个身份并没有从不同角度起到任何作用 无聊
同样是封闭空间，绑架人质，提出要求，但这部电影显然更高明一些，作为一名衣食无忧、生活幸福的幼儿园老师，她的动机一直保持到影片尾声才揭晓，悬念十足。
“自你开始观看这部电影，据统计，在印度已有8名妇女被强奸。”推动历史，需要每一位女性的觉醒和努力。
层层递进+反转
但是不杀死司机 女主真的很难好好活下去 情绪积累到最后真的哭死
立意还行但是女主演技太差，剧情也不丝滑，浪费我时间
love is pain, love is complicated
这个国家的人装聋作哑，除非你对着他们的耳朵大喊大叫，否则他们会轻易地选择忽略你的声音。
生而为女，实在悲苦。
尤其是结尾那个反转，着实意想不到
其实之前听过一位著名的法律学家说过，不给强奸犯判死刑是因为，如果判刑过重，可能会导致强奸犯破罐破摔，在犯罪过程中杀了受害者。
现实需要这样的电影。身份揭露，让有些戏剧化的剧情合理了许多。
好的电影是可以改变法律的，20220406,6+6等于几
转折过于生硬，qj这个点抛出得太直接且滞后，但故事圆得非常完美
前半段悬念做得不错的，看完我真觉得我们没资格嘲笑印度。
讲故事的方式还不错，细节和情感都处理的挺好。
逻辑漏洞还是挺多，但不影响一个道理：成人的世界都在互相游说欺骗，为了你好是共同的理由
开头蛮好，中后段节奏有点拖沓，原来AirPods轻点两下是挂电话，为什么每次给女主生气的特写都要由远到近突然那么拉一下，实在让人出戏~
跟误杀很像，但比误杀更深刻，对社会的意义也更大一些。当弱小者得不到保护，只能通过极端方式伸张正义的时候，这个国家和体制便到了无可救药的地步。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
