Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
开始没入戏。场景、造型什么的都让我感觉有点儿像综艺。投入情节以后还蛮惊喜的，本来以为是变态制片人，关一堆人大逃杀、《无人生还》的走向。当然了，讲透了，后面也就是变成了日本推理畅销书常有的男性自以为是英雄主义。升华的点是正直，朴素的正直，真善美。周杰伦的梗，观众get了，好多人笑。镜头里看到《闪灵》。导演的美术专业背景，提供了很有趣的元素。
说者无意、听者有心，当深入时代背景，在不解与了然的回味中，窥见历史反复拓印的痕迹，一个小小故事便终于闪烁出不可言喻的耐人寻味。
属于那种电影院看会给四星，在家看会给三星的片子。其实工业水平也不高，不过故事讲得还算圆。
这电影要什么有什么对吧！某镜头出来的时候全场鸦雀无声！
戏里的人用浮夸演绎浮夸，戏外的人用狭隘咒骂狭隘，火苗点燃的一瞬间，荧幕外有一万只傲慢的脚等待踩下。扬的是臭名昭著的名，立的是万般无奈的万，别有用心的人眼里，看山本来就不是山。有良知的烂片导演都开始拍真相了，有审美的影视同行却说算了算了。屋子里布满了血腥味，房顶的钩子却被擦的闪亮。没有调度，剪辑很乱，演技太差，话剧质感，如果非要把电影视为某种精密的、具有固定标准的制式仪器，我也能和那些端肩抱膀的影评人一样，找出一万种理由来批判它。但是偏偏，这部不那么电影的电影，恰恰阐释了电影存在的某种意义：屋顶上的钩子需要有人记住。在戏里，一群烂咖为了良知拍了一部烂片，在戏外，他们似乎也是这样做的，彼时彼刻，恰如此时此刻。刘循子墨点了一团名为勇气的火，麻木的人只看到烟。十个项目九个凉，因为踩灭火苗的人太多了。
红楼案还有，只是螳臂当车的电影工作者没了。
①民国上海：几个电影业内人坐在一起讨论三老被杀的案件欲借此将该谋杀案故事拍成电影扬名立万，然而随着深入调查，他们却陷入了政治风波中。影片情节多次反转。②悬疑+喜剧。③虽然故事比较有趣，但表演模式太话剧了，而且叙事节奏有点拖。
本煜就不用夸了，表现出彩。
6.9 曾经看的万万没想到团队进步真的很大，他们很懂观众需求——反转再反转，也懂一些影迷的需求——元电影，也懂一些青年的需求——强权的可怕
假作真时真亦假，真作假时假亦真。最后没拍肩膀，真是太美了，一切尽在不言中。拜伦有首诗说，“假若他日重逢，我将何以贺你，以沉默，以泪流。
看之前我觉得这个片名莫名其妙，不知道演员表有谁，也不知道是什么类型的片子，所以！就很惊喜！刚好悬疑推理是我的菜，其中还夹杂着笑点。可惜就是这帮人坚持了善良最后还是难逃魔爪。
有些地方冗长，但瑕不掩瑜，很喜欢黑色幽默以及想表达的主题，大家都在为了正义努力着
劣势在于，片名过于笼统，缺乏吸引力，影片节奏较慢，执导水平有限，电影感不强，更像话剧部分笑点尴尬。
可以说是年度最大惊喜了，放在近几年，也称得上是国产最佳悬疑片。关键是他悬疑吧，还巨踏马搞笑，演技也全员在线，台词水平很高，让人欲罢不能，意犹未尽，很想二刷。
后面为何突然拔高了那么多，好在还是民国的事儿
说真的这年头我是真的对表演特别拿腔拿调的电影喜欢不起来，像之前《血观音》就是一个例子，这里现在又多了一个。尽管你说这些电影的立意再怎么高深都好…尽管你讽刺了官官相护的习性、影视圈的潜规则和对电影审查制度的影射，且不说你讽刺的好不好，起码从情节阐述来看讽刺已经到位了，但，能不能请你收一收，别整这么夸张的行吗，鸡皮疙瘩都起来了。
提前离场了，心疼自己的钱。破例开了按摩椅（前排左右前后都没有人），不是靠着按摩我都撑不过前面一个小时。电影都被发明出来100多年了，前人的电影语言都已经进化到了何种地步，然而2021年大陆院线是这种作品，据说后面各种隐喻，我要看隐喻我干嘛去电影院呢，这年头已经畸形到了有隐喻口碑就上去了吗？？
今年到目前在院线看了两部国产好片子，一部是兰心大剧院，另一部就是这个。
“我烂片之王，我骄傲，我自豪。”
小制作的场景剧，通过揣测的“剧本”和想象的“事实”两条线的碰撞，演员带着观众一起不断地推敲与反转，从而逐渐剥茧抽丝接近最终的真相。全程都非常引人入胜，每次感觉靠近真相了，又总发现缺失关键证据链，从赌债动机-杀人动机-不可逃脱的密室-分尸转移-为爱献身，每一个新版本都更深的走入人的内心，直至最终唤醒了大家的善，每个角色在最初都有明显的缺点或不足，但最后一致的善让大家蜕变与挣脱
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
