Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
几年一度的日影爱好者狂欢。请继续拍，一直拍。只要里面的熟脸们还在营业，我的青春就好像还没散场。
婚礼两个花童的感觉
马耳他地中海太美了太美了～又提到杰西和star好伤感～主线其实有点拖沓但分几part呈现的效果还不错～
可以了，不要再拍了。感觉又费钱又不好看，套路都一样，不能玩个别的IP吗？还有，尽量不要让我看到东出的脸了，谢谢。
反转虽好猜，却过瘾。赤星已经彻底沦为达子的粉丝。
一直在滑进度条，期待甜蜜蜜时光
比上一部好看。濑户康史演得不错。赤星都变成达子的小猫了。star和杰西还活在台词里。
劇粉福利，櫻桃補糖… （TW院線2022-04-08與日本同步上映… )
哈哈哈哈笑死。看行騙天下，從看行騙手法到現在猜誰才是最後的冤大頭（還有哪些是小貓）www 不過果然赤星才是“真愛”233 Jesse和STAR的“劇情”出現差點哇一聲哭出來，古澤還是有心的。卡司豪華得沒法說，陽子姐姐好帥。
叙事比前几部有新意了，总之就是欺诈师永远不会输。以及，终于完结了……
什么才是英雄啊，这是个很好的点子。
赤星：一天不被达子骗，难受一天。
表演浮夸，剧情也不能细想。但熬过了前面一个多小时，还能看！就是漫画嘛，何必当真。
框架搞这么大挺没意思的 主线故事水平和之前持平 前半部分铺垫过长
感觉可以结束了这个系列，虽然拍成常青树也不是不可以，毕竟速度与激情都拍第10部了
布的局挺大的，但是翻来覆去还是流程化的反转，引起了极度的审美疲劳，在行骗手法上创新太少了
我很显然不是电影的受众群体，完全进入不了这种“扭捏”洒满工业糖精的fairytale
这个系列其实面向的是具备二次元逻辑的观众群。
大致剧情我都预测到了，意外在于真梨邑的身份设计。前一个小时真的太蠢了，不知道什么时候编剧能像之前一样，把假的一幕也设计得真一点，太假的话观众就只会在意真相是如何，前面的铺垫就会成为流水账和浪费时长的辣眼破烂。
越来越离谱，也越来越无聊了。不断的时间提示和闪回画面，证明编剧并不想在这部戏上耗费精力。长泽雅美的漫画式表演也浮夸过头了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
