Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
变态女杀手可以独自美丽啊，为啥要有个变态继父，最后因为心软还被反杀了，烂尾差评警告⚠️
Call me by my name, Margret. 俗套剧情+古典配乐+惊艳女主，主要是为了看莉莉库拉格。
房东Marlkovici明知风险巨大，还贪十万二十万的便宜; 任何安防系统没有报警键吗？观众都傻子吗？
黑蟹军事行动，靠溜冰鞋横穿冰面护送生化病毒！一心想见女儿的女主母亲，被军方欺骗，最后毁掉生化病毒！军事堡垒能拿到病毒，就是这么魔性！虽然冰面创意不错，但拍的太差，剧情真是乏味！太扯！
并未出现《Gomorra》类似的风格，略失望。
女主挺漂亮的，却有一颗邪恶的心。男主有钱又弱智，活该被骗。
五星单纯给长相完美身体比例完美的女主，这么完美的女主居然被安排完输这个片子就只配的一星
海报以为是什么黑吃黑剧情呢 又一条疯狗 不过女主确实漂亮
很一般的网大剧，IT宅男碰上pua拜金女，几乎被榨干还差点送命，最后靠领养的5岁小女儿翻盘。逻辑硬伤不少。拜金女很漂亮，演坏人可惜了。
战争的寒冬中，没有一片雪花是无辜的…PS：永远不要欺骗一个母亲！
初中习作水平的剧本和台词，演技拉跨的男女主，却能请来大牌影星配戏。莫非这片是娃娃脸女主的某个俄罗斯糖爹投的？
氛围挺好，背景太虚无了，估计是成本问题吧，然后故事就跟着有些虚无了，最后的大部队都像草台班子似的。雪地里逆光的场景蛮好。
她没必要在还没完全掌控局面的情况下先杀了她继父的……
最后有点崩塌，可惜了。前面的行动很是精彩，险象环生，步步紧逼，几乎让人喘不过气来。几个人物立体，很鲜活，不做作
冰面滑行这么好的背景设定发挥好了可以拍成爽片的
三星给电影，一星给女主的颜值，剧情。。。总感觉怪怪的，感觉到处是bug，又到处挺合理。反正看得我很气，这男的太窝囊了，你要把女主搞的战斗能力厉害点，我都没那么气
联系自己:1.财不外露，要低调。
没看出房子有多高科技。女主是真的漂亮，特别喜欢她作为一个变态但说话神态都很放松很舒服的感觉
女主很漂亮，还有裸露戏，可以打三星了，虽然电影一般，太俗套
非常具有现实意义和值得反思的影片，虽然剧情简单，但场景和设定不错。女主演技超群，层次感，情绪控制内敛却到位，让整部影片活了起来，一个人独扛两星。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
