Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
很有新意，通灵版密室逃脱，每个道具都有伏笔，这一点非常赞
有点被里面的勇气打动到，再过几年，等儿子再长大一点，挺想和他一起再看一遍的。小男主的五官美如玉，挺有魂断威尼斯的范儿。
低于预期，原本期待的少年与黑暗伊桑霍克对手戏以及紧急营救都没有，妹妹和警察的追查线对主角几乎没有任何帮助，甚至连剧情推进作用都没有，着实令人失望。光靠jump scare和几句口号不会给人留下什么好印象。
美国小孩上个学好累哦，动不动被校霸打得头破血流，杀过人才能拥有免遭霸凌的street credit
有点险恶的影子，但相比之下还是差了，拍的有点商业化。其实故事我很喜欢，总觉得剧情可以拓展更多（不过可能因为涉及儿童谋杀不好拍出来），而不是用一惊一乍的音乐来吓人，还有就是Ethan扮演的变态到底为什么要绑架谋杀小男孩啊，童年阴影之类的，到最后什么背景都没交代就被反杀了…btw最后主角反杀的时候我旁边一黑哥在那叫好：“Yeah! Right! Hit that motherfucker!” 笑死我了
2022.7.24于长沙高铁。所以最大的亮点是神级callback？
说是恐怖片，更有点像儿童奇幻片，最后通过种种努力，孩子们团结起来打倒了坏人，有点像小丑回魂的感觉。
原著小说作者Joe Hill，怪不得有点斯蒂芬金的味道。而且有点《怪奇物语》的感觉，男主妹妹像怪奇里的max
凶手是伊森霍克演的，完全没看出来
几位小朋友的演技真的很不错，Ethan基本打酱油。剧情就有点迷离和割裂
情节紧张，很重视细节，几乎都能衔接上，合格的惊悚片……
离谱！离大谱！！再也不看披着讲精彩故事外衣的私货观点电影！！！
6.5分
节奏比较慢，结尾真是爽到了，瘦弱男孩虐杀变态狂，警察一如既往的废物。
ethan气质确实太强，一半脸一双眼都能让人隐约猜出来。
可怜的坏人的哥哥，比警察强。
导演你好意思吊了我大半年胃口就这？一点都不暴力，搁这玩儿呢！30/100
不是特别喜欢超自然的恐怖片。
虽然剧本完成度比较高，但还是有点失望。本来以为是恐怖片，结果只是奇幻悬疑的儿童成长电影。成片更像是靠场外求助完成密室逃脱的真人秀，穿插参赛选手家庭背景介绍，游戏结束还有亲友团拥抱环节
无趣，竟然有人说是近几年最好的恐怖片?害人不浅
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
