Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
似是疑非地肯定了虛構的價值，最後還是過橋抽板地回歸所謂現實。如果沒有種粉碎人工智能的心，那就不要嘗試去給他們一顆心。
精彩、刺激、节奏爽，许多游戏梗令人喷饭，值得在大银幕观赏。对于自由主题的表达想深入但弄巧成拙，NPC角色的觉醒并没有真正通向自由，是从一个刻板化的邪恶资本家手中进入了新自由主义的画饼充饥。创造者（新老板）为人工智能的自由意志落泪，但最后还是把他留在了虚拟世界，拒绝与之相爱。如果有胆量突破这个结局，故事会超越很多。
水平一般，不看也没什么损失。
马东锡空手照样干翻带武器的，一边倒的打架看起来就是爽
查宁·塔图姆自己玩起自己当年做过舞男的梗，彻底给我笑飞
Channing Tatum和某漫威男星客串是惊喜。其他内容感觉很无感，甚至爱情戏份很俗套。创意基本上来自《乐高大电影》（Lego Movie）、《楚门的世界》（Truman Show）和《头号玩家》（Ready Player One）的综合，角色略卡通化，没有留下深刻印象的内容。
//好的黑客需要学会在游戏里学会接吻动作，不然主角失忆就无法挽回了hhh//
杀人的兵刃喝血太多，生出了恻隐之心，不愿再喝血，自断。
好欢乐的片子，虽然套路，但足够娱乐。贱贱这次完全是驾轻就熟，诠释了另一版本的死侍。
这部片子跟《The Truman Show》只是表层结构相似，实际上着眼完全相反，谈不上内核深浅高低。它更像06年的《Stranger than Fiction》。
韭菜拒绝任人摆布，觉醒做起自由公民。比想象中好太多了，8.0
盖在最后要是换一身死侍皮肤就完美了。😂😂😂
很有趣啊！轻松版本的《黑镜》其中一集。虚拟人的生命是生命吗？是的。其实创造了一个新世界，这个世界是一个可交流的“平行世界”。我们既是“上帝”也是“朋友”。（出现漫威梗我真的笑到停不下来！）
3+2
B / 中途Guy质疑人生意义的时候已经无限接近一种对存在意义的哲思，但只是这毕竟不应该是继续往下探讨的批判性电影，终归回归到娱乐性言情剧。最后一台服务器仍然不会被试验性地摧毁，来映证人生皆为此时此刻的结论。
看到最后竟有点泪目！有点像头号玩家，迪士尼爸爸要多放点梗就好了。本来以为故事俗套但发现还不错～推荐推荐
质感太像《乐高大电影》了
其实还蛮老套的，很多逻辑的东西也不能深究，千万别扯楚门的梗，完全不是一个路数，但再次给了迪爸爸彰显家底的机会，光剑和星盾出来那一刻全场嗨翻天，不过MVP我还是想给Wrecking ball
三星半有了，剧情比较简单，有bug，但打斗戏一如既往精彩，这一部是偏1v1，剧本就是为马东锡和孙锡久写的，除了正反两派，哈尔滨张谦最出彩，只不过他是搞笑来的hhhh
不是没有亲吻的操作吗……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
